Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Nymphing Tip #3


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 623
Date:
Nymphing Tip #3
Permalink  
 


Ditch the indicator!

There was a great article in a past California Fly Fisher about direct contact nymphing. Basically high sticking without an indicator. The article states that no matter how well you think you are dead drifting, if you have an indicator tied on you are causing drag. You will learn to get better drifts without the indicator. It will make you better at line control and you will actually get a better "feel" on subtle hits. This works especially well on smaller water like Putah, Little Truckee, Sierra streams, etc.

I stopped using an indicator after reading the article and feel like my catch rate has actually improved! I can't explain why it is but I get much more tuned into the drift and just know when to set the hook. You will usually feel the take sooner than if waiting for your indicator to dunk. Plus you get the bonus of feeling the fish hit rather than just watching your indicator.
I will still use an indicator on big water like the Lower Yuba or parts of the Truckee, etc. I have fished with guys on this board and they can attest that I still catch just as many fish without an indicator.

Give it a try, you might like it!


__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 26
Date:
Permalink  
 

Question:  I've used an indicator to help me detect the strike and also to help regulate the depth of the flies. I can see how you can use feel to detect the strike, but how do you control the depth without an indicator?  

Flounder

P.S. Thanks for the tips. These are very helpful.

-- Edited by Flounder at 14:25, 2009-02-03

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 623
Date:
Permalink  
 

Most water you'd fish without an indicator is smaller water like Putah. You will rarely have more than 10 feet of fly line out, usually less. You can regulate depth by how high or low you hold your rod, lower will get the flies deeper, higher will get it shallower. Most of the time when I fish my fly line isn't even touching the water or only the first foot or two will be on the water. Once you get used to fishing without one you just figure it out and it becomes natural. There have been times when I've caught fish without ever feeling them strike. You get very in tuned to watching the drift and when you get good at it you just know when to set the hook...hard to explain until you try it but i'st kind of like using "The Force" wink

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 195
Date:
Permalink  
 


I like Packrat's Trout "Jedi" reference. I'm still a "Padawan" learner for sure though. confuse

I've been trying ween myself off the indicator(s). Especially with the flows the way they've been. It's been a bit like typing or playing a musical instrument. When I stop obsessing about "is that a take? ... is that a take?" It becomes more obvious.

Wearing polarized sun glasses, and concentrating on your "drift" and the line has helped me a ton.  Sometimes, something as subtle as my line slowing will trigger me to set, sometimes its a belly flash where I think my rig is, or a combination.  More and more often its just becoming an "instinct" that the critter is sucking my bug.wink

I believe I am on my way to total consciousness ... but am also thinking about a 12 step program to get me off of the indicators.

__________________
"You tell yourself that it will be both educational and spiritually uplifting, as all imaginative excuses for goofing off are." John Gierach, "Music of the Spheres".


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 338
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yes, Packrat--direct contact was mentioned in an older thread, Strike Indicators.  Glad you brought this up again!  Definitely, indicators too often become a crutch. 

I refer to Gierach's "Zen and the Art of Nymph-Fishing" from Trout Bum.  Great read--excellent insight!  To steal a line..."There's an instant of tightness in the normal dance of the leader in current that indicates a trout has mouthed the fly--however briefly or gently--and you can tell, the way you can tell from the sound whether a guitar string has been struck by a musician or say, bumped by the tail of a passing dog." 

His imagery of melting butter on a perfectly browned pancake (brown trout bellies), flashing like a mirror under the surface, and viewing the general vicinity of the drift instead of just the indicator have helped me see nymph fishing in a different light.

Looking forward to more tips.





__________________
There's no greater fan of fly fishing than the worm...




Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 1808
Date:
Permalink  
 

Dutchman, Thats one of my favorite Gierach essays. I think nymphing is the ultimate game of paying attention, Theres only one way to get it and that is to do it !

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 909
Date:
Permalink  
 

I still have your book Shawn. Haven't finished it yet, but I'll get it back to you the next time I see you.

__________________
Mama said bait fishing is the devil!


Master Fly Fishing Guide

Status: Offline
Posts: 531
Date:
Permalink  
 

I personally believe or have expierienced great success with no indicator as long as my fly is no further than about 10 ft from my rod tip,anything beyond that I like to use an indicator because I feel I can get a more natural drift as long as I mend properly. I strongly feel that since the invention of indicator,flyfishermen have lost their "sixth sense" when it comes to catching fish. Bono

__________________
Greg Bonovich
greg@putahcreekflyfishing.com
http://www.putahcreekflyfishing.com
Phone: 800-480-5285
Cell: 707-480-3809


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 623
Date:
Permalink  
 

That's a good way to put it, a sixth sense. After practicing it for a while I just know when a fish is there, it's weird but true.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 140
Date:
Permalink  
 

There are numerous ways of fishing without an indicator.  Hanging a nymph
off a dry is sort of cheating but an effective way to go.  I like swinging wet flies and soft hackle flies like the old english flies used on the chalkstreams.
They still work.  I really like the feel of a trout hitting the end of a swinging
wet fly.  You can do the same thing with diving caddis flies.  When you dead drift a nymph, it is sometimes hard to tell because unless they've hooked up
and are starting to run, you are often late setting the hook and they're gone.
That's why high sticking is good if you are not using an indicator.  As for using an indicator I don't care about the style points, any more than wearing
gore-tex waders with the zipper down the front.  If you are concerned about it don't do it.


__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 817
Date:
Permalink  
 

I would have to agree with you Yukon Mike. Swinging soft hackles is the most fun if you can't get the fish to hit the dries or if you are tired of fishing with an indicator. The takes are amazing and the soft hackles have actually produced some very large fish on many rivers. Can't wait for the March Browns on the Yuba!! Just bought a spey rod to swing some march brown soft hackles.

__________________
chris


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 101
Date:
Permalink  
 

Seeing is forgetting the name of the thing one sees.

__________________

http://tonysalpenglow.blogspot.com



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 35
Date:
Permalink  
 

I would like to hear the logic behind the idea that indicators always cause drag. Also for those who think indicators are the devil how do you fish cross stream lies 40 feet away? What about times when light conditions prohibit being able to see your leader? If you can see 4x or 5x tippet clearly enough in all light conditions 40-50 feet away do it! I guess if you just want to make things harder for yourself to feel some kind of masochistic pleasure more power to ya. It's just that when I go fishing I want to catch fish. If I wanted a challenge I would try to get them with my bare hands. If you want to be a "purist" then go back to cane rods with silk lines and catgut leaders-it's the same rationale for shunning indicators eh? Next time out I am going out naked and grab trout-now THAT is REAL fishing.

Tie the fly. Drift the fly. Catch the trout. Repeat.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 215
Date:
Permalink  
 

I think this is the logic as to why indicators cause drag.  Trout tend to lay near the bottom of the stream.  Just above the bottom of the stream there is a layer of water that moves slower than the water immediately above; this layer of water moves slower due to friction (if I remember my physics correctly, it's called a laminar boundary layer).  It's the same reason that the current next to the shore moves slower than the water a few feet away.  If you fish with an indicator and your indicator is moving at the speed of the surface of the water, the fly attached you your indicator is moving at the same speed.  This means that your fly passing over the trout is moving faster than the current the trout is sitting in, i.e. it is "dragging".  That said, even though I'm sure that there is some truth to this logic, I still use indicators because they simplify my fishing and increase my productivity.  I also believe that I would become a better overall nymph fisherman if I took off the indicator, but this is something I have yet to work on.   

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 50
Date:
Permalink  
 

Your science is right the way I understand it Nohackle, except that instead of a single layer that flows slower, there are multiple layers like the skin of an onion. The water furthest from the sources of friction (the sides, and the bottom mostly) flows the fastest. The boundry layer is actually pretty small, and it is difficult to float a nymph in this layer without hooking the bottom, but really skilled nymphers can probably pull it off. Regardless anything below the surface is going to move at a different speed than something floating at the surface, or even at a different depth or different stream position. The way I understand it the flyline is going to have the same effect as the indicator. Your nymph is going to sink down to a certain depth and then it is going to suspend at a certain depth depending on its weight. If your indicator is the only thing stopping your fly from sinking further it will create tension. If your fly line is the only thing stopping your fly from sinking further, it will create tension. If either fly line or indicator is drifting at a different speed than the fly it will create tension. What you ideally want is for your fly line or indicator to drift at roughly the same speed as the nymph so that it dosen't create tension at all. This is accomplished by mending, but without an indicator you get less clues as to when there is drag. Instead it has to be done by feel. More power to the people who can pull this off, but it is possible to get a drag free drift with an indicator, in fact I find it easier. What I can't do is get as long of a drag free drift, but since I still have problems both detecting strikes and detecting drag without an indicator, I have better success with them. I don't think the ditch the indicator advice is necessarily correct. It can be a very useful tool for people who are still learning to read drift, and haven't developed that sixth sense to detect strikes. Sometimes I set the hook before my indicator goes down because I see the strike, but otherwise the indicator twitches long before the line pauses.

-- Edited by Psyfisher at 02:03, 2009-02-23

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 65
Date:
Permalink  
 

I think the example of the onion skin is a good one and the water speed increasing as it is found further from friction sources is absolutely correct. This is especially evident in the California aquaduct where it flows unimpeded for miles in a straight line...It's when you start adding rocks, logs, bends, narrowing or  widening the stream and adding bottom contours and the other gazillion things impacting water flow that you find the interesting stuff that impact where a feeding fish will be found.

So, it's the angler's responsibilty not just to get a drag free drift. He also has to read the water and get his flies in the seam, feeding lane or correct current flow so that his flies get in front of the targeted fish and at the right depth. (How about pocket water, as opposed to a run?)

Those things are what require you to mend half your line up and the other half down from time to time...that makes the top 3 feet of line to incessantly move immediately downstream of your tippet or indicator so that you have to mend repeatedly or determine that that top 3 feet is actually NOT dragging your fly and you can let it ride...etc, etc, etc, to infinity...

That's why so many popular and effective indicators now have a little something on the top that gives you the direction your indicator is being pulled (up or down stream) and if your flies are in the same current line with your cator.

I use the Rio nymphing line with the brightly colored tip and find I can fish small water effectively with it...and I love fishing that way. I'm not yet good enough to effectively fish larger waters that way and thus use a cator when I think I need it.

So, from a drift boat on the Trinity I often go "naked" while wading the Trinity I use an indicator. My proximity and angle to the point the tippet goes under water is the deciding factor...and from a drift boat on the lower Sac I use a cator because the currents in those big runs are going seemingly all directions at once. I'm not good enough to read the action of the line and flies to go without.

Personally, in water that is appropriate I'd rather swing flies or pull streamers, but the catch rate for me falls dramatically in inappropriate water and I cater up pretty fast....I'm there for the feel of the fish on my fly rod and I'll do whatever it takes to get that feeling...the tug is the drug, after all...

just my 2 cents...-Mike

-- Edited by stlhdr at 11:26, 2009-02-23

__________________
It's all about the grab!


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 187
Date:
Permalink  
 

I'd like to say that I have really enjoyed reading all of your opinions on fishing with and without an indicator. There are very few people that truly have a solid grasp on the concept of the drag free drift when it comes to nymph fishing but you guys have some really interesting and vivid ways of explaining it! One thing I'd like to add that I don't think anyone touched on is that sometimes, especially when tight line nymphing, a dead drift is not necessarily what we are trying to achieve. When I first started to learn nymphing without an indicator I did a lot of research into the Polish nymphing style. After reading information from multiple different sources on the technique I realized that they all had one thing in common and it had to do with the way the flies are presented to the fish. The flies are "lead" downstream by the fisherman using the rod tip, which is held as close to the water as possible in order to create a tight, direct connection between the rod tip and the flies. When doing this technique correctly the fisherman is actually moving his flies faster than the speed of the current in order to keep the line tight and create a direct connection. The technique is all about feel, and it is nearly impossible to feel your flies bouncing along the bottom if you are using a normal slack line/dead drift type of presentation. One source described the technique as picking a leaf or piece of debris floating in the current and attempting to move your rig just a hair faster. This way the line stays tight and you can feel when the flies hit rocks or end up in the mouth of a fish! I experimented alot with this method last season while fishing the Pit which is an ideal river for short line nymphing. I was amazed at how well I could feel the underwater structure and detect subtle strikes. I think this is a different technique than what you guys are discussing above but alot of the same concepts such as feeling the bottom and the strike transfer over very well. I think it is important not to confuse tight line nymphing with dead drift nymphing because the because the basic theories of the two techniques are contradicting. With dead drift nymphing you want your nymph to be floating along naturally at the speed of the current layer the fish is feeding in.
We accomplish this by mending extra slack so that the current on the surface does not drag our flies unnaturally. With a tight line presentation the only way to maintain contact with your flies is to keep tension in the line and leader, you certainly do not want any slack in your line whatsoever or you will not feel any strikes! Polish nymphing is only one of the many ways that you can nymph with no indicator, and all the methods you guys described above are completely effective. I simply want to add that there is a huge difference between tight line and dead drift nymphing whether or not you choose to add an indicator to your leader. With the many situations we are presented with during a given day on the river there is opportunity to use all of the methods discussed above and I think they all have their place in the arsenal of the dynamic nymph fisherman!

__________________
"when you put your hand into a flowing stream you touch the last that has come before and the first of what is still to come" -DaVinci


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 65
Date:
Permalink  
 

Good call, Chuck....I have friends who "Czeck nymph" as well...I have enough trouble dead drifting and haven't tried it yet...lol

__________________
It's all about the grab!


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 35
Date:
Permalink  
 

Obviously it is impossible to effectively "no bobber" nymph cross stream 40 feet away. If this presentation is required then you will need some type of indicator to fish effectively with a dead drifted nymph. This is a given and I apologize for asking for examples.
The one variable in the rigging which has not been mentioned with indicators is shot. The question to ask yourself is does (lets use yarn indicators as an example) an indicator with a split shot somewhere below it move the same speed as the surface of the water with that little "anchor" dragging behind?
Try this: get an indicator and put a large shot about where you think the depth of the run is. Mend line when you drift downstream so that your line is not pulling at the yarn. Compare the speed of the yarn to say...bubbles on the surface passing by.
Now ask yourself if indicators always float at the speed of the water on the surface of the stream.

Tie the fly. Drift the fly. Catch the trout. Repeat.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 65
Date:
Permalink  
 

Grahler....my indicator consistently moves slower than the surface current and (I believe) faster than my flies...because (I believe) the water the fish is laying in is moving slower than the surface current...(see the whole bit re friction impacting water speed)...

I have nothing to hang my hat on to support the belief that the flow at the fish's level is slower than the surface, except the word of several guide buddies and my experience catching fish...if anyone REALLY knows I'd like to learn more.

On a long drift as I'm playing out line I will sometimes pull my indicator back, because I don't want it pulling my flies along...(not alweays approved of by my guide buddies)

I also catch a few on the 'hang" at the end of a drift if i can get my flies to start rising directly up and not off to the side...the idea being the fish will perceive the action as bugs headed to the surface...

-Mike

__________________
It's all about the grab!


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 623
Date:
Permalink  
 

No hackle is correct. The thing to remember on the style of fishing I'm talking about is done with a short amount of fly line out of he rod tip. It would be difficult to fish 40 feet away and without an indicator and have any control. It's not impossible but more difficult. I did say the technique works best on smaller water. As Chuck said, you won't always see any line movement with subtle strikes but when you're in the zone you "feel" the take, setting the hook becomes a natural reaction.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 35
Date:
Permalink  
 

If I only have a bit of line out my technique is probably the same as yours, Packrat. I just like to know if I want to hit that lie on the other side of the stream without 20 minutes of walking I can. To each their own.

Tie the fly. Drift the fly. Catch the trout. Repeat.

__________________
JT


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 1205
Date:
Permalink  
 

I use an indicator for most of my fishing.  I'm not afraid to tight line nymph, though.  Sometimes I'll leave the indicator out of the water and high stick a run.  When fishing with an indicator don't be afraid to add some action to your flies, especially if you're fishing with rubberlegged nymphs.  Just give your indicator a slight tug (which will move your flies), then let it continue on its drift.  I discovered this on accident, because no matter how good I think I am at mending sometimes I move the indicator.  And I couldn't tell you how many times I've had fish hit mid-mend. 

__________________

"Nothing makes a fish bigger than almost being caught."



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 1808
Date:
Permalink  
 

I'm with JT on this one, I pretty much do the same, fish with an indicator and just leave it on when i high stick, Quickest and easiest way to be ready for almost any situation. I was surprised to see someone bring up fish hitting mid mend, The biggest trout I have ever danced with hit mid mend. Didn't land it but I think someone else did a few days later biggrin.gif. I also beleive that sometimes you should change out your indicator if you have fished a spot for awhile with the same indicator give em something different as i'm sure they have seen it pass over em several times and they can become spooked at that. I also believe alot of people use much to large of an indicator. One more thing that I beleive is that nymphing with a flyrod that is ultra sensitive will greatly improve ones catch, There is a sensitivity in a high end rod that you just cannot get from a lesser rod, By no means am I advocating going out and dropping a grand on a rod but if you can why not ? And trust me I can't. And the biggest nymphing tip is PAY ATTENTION !

-- Edited by shon42073 at 18:32, 2009-02-25

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard